Hezbollah, with the full support of Tehran, is fully engaged in the conflict in Syria, resulting in a complete reversal of the data on the battlefield within a few days: First the key town of Kousair, near the Lebanese border, then Golan-next in line Kousair cease-fell into the hands of government forces, now promoted in the region of Aleppo and the border with Turkey.
So instead of the intervention of the West and Turkey to overthrow Assad have surgery Iran-Hezbollah with political support of Moscow not only to rescue the beleaguered Assad, but to succeed crushing blow to the insurgency. It is obvious that the above are in shade tolerance of both the U.S. and Israel, which realistically cynical prefer Assad, Hezbollah and Iran from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the various fundamentalist Al Qaeda type groups.
In other cases, even very recently, Israel struck Hezbollah in a show-preventive intervention fist. The above is obviously represents a new conflict in Syria, yet also represent a inglorious end of interventionism of Erdogan / Davutoglu to control developments in Damascus in the post-Assad era. Fortunately, the management of the internal turmoil in Turkey gives him a decent pretense folding.
The difference of Syria from other theaters upheavals of the Arab Spring (Tunisia, Egypt and Libya) is more than obvious: In Tunis, Cairo and Tripoli was regime change, while Damascus was compromised first survival of Syria as unitary state and secondly a religious-communal conflict of Sunni Islam with all other minorities and communities not only in the country and the wider region.
The U.S., declining great power for interventional capabilities in times of economic crisis, could not afford to add Syria as a third failed country, next to Afghanistan and Iraq.
So instead of the intervention of the West and Turkey to overthrow Assad have surgery Iran-Hezbollah with political support of Moscow not only to rescue the beleaguered Assad, but to succeed crushing blow to the insurgency. It is obvious that the above are in shade tolerance of both the U.S. and Israel, which realistically cynical prefer Assad, Hezbollah and Iran from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the various fundamentalist Al Qaeda type groups.
In other cases, even very recently, Israel struck Hezbollah in a show-preventive intervention fist. The above is obviously represents a new conflict in Syria, yet also represent a inglorious end of interventionism of Erdogan / Davutoglu to control developments in Damascus in the post-Assad era. Fortunately, the management of the internal turmoil in Turkey gives him a decent pretense folding.
The difference of Syria from other theaters upheavals of the Arab Spring (Tunisia, Egypt and Libya) is more than obvious: In Tunis, Cairo and Tripoli was regime change, while Damascus was compromised first survival of Syria as unitary state and secondly a religious-communal conflict of Sunni Islam with all other minorities and communities not only in the country and the wider region.
The U.S., declining great power for interventional capabilities in times of economic crisis, could not afford to add Syria as a third failed country, next to Afghanistan and Iraq.
No comments:
Post a Comment